Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.2% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 517670:517700 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962316221083859872
,
Nov 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_browser_cpu_time_per_frame/infinite_scrolling.html Change : 0.93% | 4.01878293793 -> 4.03496018435 Suspected Commit Range 4 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/587f2238d3e7e98255914371e8f2dc8a08c7e378..126a0e6e97f36b67ddcc38569e946c5621aeb643 Revision Result N chromium@517669 4.01878 +- 0.079745 14 good chromium@517687 4.01765 +- 0.051913 14 good chromium@517690 4.01644 +- 0.0930642 21 good chromium@517691 --- --- build failure chromium@517692 --- --- build failure chromium@517693 --- --- build failure chromium@517694 4.03744 +- 0.0677105 14 bad chromium@517700 4.03496 +- 0.0615715 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=infinite.scrolling.html thread_times.key_silk_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962316221083859872 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962038620452746832
,
Nov 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_browser_cpu_time_per_frame/infinite_scrolling.html Change : 1.09% | 4.00219433074 -> 4.03620219328 Suspected Commit Range 7 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/7b33c549911215282621c311701672fa3fd672cf..20a2f79a07d5664411e1f65b7ba4ca8ac4197d2f Revision Result N chromium@517669 4.00219 +- 0.0333723 9 good chromium@517685 4.01749 +- 0.0749729 14 good chromium@517693 4.01754 +- 0.0860526 14 good chromium@517694 --- --- build failure chromium@517695 --- --- build failure chromium@517696 --- --- build failure chromium@517697 --- --- build failure chromium@517698 --- --- build failure chromium@517699 --- --- build failure chromium@517700 4.0362 +- 0.0634478 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=infinite.scrolling.html thread_times.key_silk_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962038620452746832 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 22 2018
Bisect isn't actually reproing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 21 2017