Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
29.1%-52.7% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 488948:514831 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962666727746318032
,
Nov 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962666727746318032 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 21 2017
Adding "Speed>Bisection" component because "Bisect failed for unknown reasons"
,
Nov 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962289656558628016
,
Nov 21 2017
Retried on a smaller range, the recipe bisect timed out resolving the commits in the range since there's some ~16k commits in that range. Pinpoint also doesn't have this problem, and we're migrating to Win this/next week so we could try again there if we really want to bisect that enormous range.
,
Nov 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:new_space:allocated_objects_size_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962289656558628016 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 23 2017
Hmm didn't realize that all the windows regressions were the same 16k or so range. Will need to wait until next week when we migrate Pinpoint.
,
Nov 7
This regression has been open for half a year. It's not very actionable and the regression has been in all Chrome user's hands for months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 17 2017