New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 785998 link

Starred by 3 users
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 643716
Owner: ----
Closed: Nov 2017
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Linux
Pri: 2
Type: Bug



Sign in to add a comment

SVG icon is not being re-rendered after Fragment Identifier change

Reported by saroy...@gmail.com, Nov 16 2017 
UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/62.0.3202.75 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Open index.html(attached) in the Chrome browser 
2. Hover the button
3. Observe
4. Open index.html in the Firefox (v56)
5. Hover the button
6. Observe

What is the expected behavior?
In steps #3 and #6 the behavior is consistent and Background of the button is being updated according to the Fragment identifier set by ":hover" CSS pseudo-class.

What went wrong?
In step #3 the button background is not updated on "hover", until the rendering is not caused by additional even (ex. Click on the button).

Did this work before? N/A 

Does this work in other browsers? N/A

Chrome version: 62.0.3202.75  Channel: stable
OS Version: Ubuntu 14.04LTE
Flash Version: 

I'm currently looking for alternatives/workaround to fix this issue in Adblock Plus for Chrome -> https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5990
fragment-id-issue-testcase.zip
554 bytes Download

Comment 1 by saroy...@gmail.com, Nov 16 2017 

I can't find a way to update the ticket, but current two fields need to be updated IMO:

* Which component does this fall under? Blink->SVG
* Does this work in other browsers? Yes - This is just/also a Chromium problem?

Comment 2 by wangyix@chromium.org, Nov 16 2017

Components: Blink>SVG

Comment 3 by f...@opera.com, Nov 16 2017

Mergedinto: 643716
Status: Duplicate (was: Unconfirmed)
I'm not aware of any workaround for this issue, but I'd suspect that the old "add query component" ("?random") to the URL might "fix" it. I wouldn't consider that a great solution though (but it's similar to what's suggested in the AB+ issue.)

Comment 4 by saroy...@gmail.com, Nov 16 2017 

Yes, as a temporary quick fix "?random" can be a good idea, thanks for the tip.
►

Sign in to add a comment