Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4%-463.2% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 514859:515182 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 16 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962786563771409952
,
Nov 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : total:500ms_window:renderer_eqt:v8:gc:latency-mark-compactor_max/total:500ms_window:renderer_eqt:v8:gc:latency-mark-compactor_max To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962786563771409952 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 18 2017
,
Nov 21 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962288645495885104
,
Nov 21 2017
This failed because none of the runs produced the metric being bisected. It's a summary metric I believe, and since there's a failing page it's not being produced. I tried kicking this off on another metric for a specific page.
,
Nov 22 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Nghia Nguyen Commit : 564e33d345ee080be36ad0e6b6107afbcd09df4d Date : Tue Nov 07 14:06:23 2017 Subject: Update wprgo binaries to latest version Bisect Details Configuration: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : Parse:duration_avg/browse_news/browse_news_reddit Change : 3.20% | 269.024333333 -> 277.630333333 Revision Result N chromium@515085 269.024 +- 6.74727 6 good chromium@515123 269.525 +- 10.0986 9 good chromium@515142 269.371 +- 6.54157 9 good chromium@515147 270.0 +- 19.6455 14 good chromium@515148 268.631 +- 2.61587 6 good chromium@515148,catapult@a7fb6add75 268.159 +- 3.64782 6 good chromium@515148,catapult@b33d83ad5d 268.828 +- 4.45252 6 good chromium@515148,catapult@564e33d345 277.795 +- 8.07244 6 bad <-- chromium@515148,catapult@c169bba255 278.937 +- 13.5029 6 bad chromium@515149 280.556 +- 11.8145 6 bad chromium@515151 278.307 +- 11.1805 9 bad chromium@515160 277.63 +- 10.4858 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.reddit v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962288645495885104 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 16 2017