Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
83.4%-323.5% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop at 503675:514836 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962945564288534352
,
Nov 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Bisect failed for unknown reasons Please contact the team (see below) and report the error. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Metric : total:500ms_window:renderer_eqt:v8:gc:full-mark-compactor_max/total:500ms_window:renderer_eqt:v8:gc:full-mark-compactor_max To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962945564288534352 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
May 14 2018
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 14 2017