Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
52.5%-94.1% regression in media.desktop at 515193:515336 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963018695597816560
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.vp9.webm_background Revision Result N chromium@515245 4025728 +- 3362822 21 good chromium@515336 3726144 +- 4341385 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.vp9.webm.background media.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963018695597816560 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 27 2017
No regression found. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 13 2017