Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
25.8% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 515323:515414 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963023472905515552
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515322 5.04633 +- 0.592869 21 good chromium@515414 5.18555 +- 1.64263 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963023472905515552 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962941927647833152
,
Nov 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515322 5.19121 +- 1.95314 21 good chromium@515414 5.08592 +- 1.49482 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962941927647833152 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962914198163183472
,
Nov 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515322 5.07983 +- 0.43888 21 good chromium@515414 5.08643 +- 0.438444 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962914198163183472 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962852159884848448
,
Nov 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515322 5.1237 +- 0.607134 21 good chromium@515414 5.06974 +- 1.68545 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962852159884848448 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 12 2018
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 13 2017