Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.7%-20.5% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 515415:515544 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963036213801317760
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963036148274166672
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/canvas_90000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515492 30.1533 +- 6.61665 21 good chromium@515544 30.7655 +- 5.29289 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=canvas.90000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963036213801317760 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_hover_75000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515492 49.3686 +- 4.49336 21 good chromium@515544 49.7956 +- 8.69253 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.hover.75000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963036148274166672 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963022384681234192
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_hover_40000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515492 35.498 +- 3.3849 21 good chromium@515544 35.3117 +- 3.17811 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.hover.40000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963022384681234192 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 14 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962941629654479856
,
Nov 14 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/canvas_50000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515492 37.2802 +- 4.90781 21 good chromium@515544 37.694 +- 5.71822 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=canvas.50000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962941629654479856 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 15 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962854234949116672
,
Nov 15 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_50000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@515492 38.5452 +- 3.70169 21 good chromium@515544 38.8789 +- 3.58752 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.50000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8962854234949116672 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 12 2018
Not sure why bisect can't repro, but they all came back down again. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 13 2017