Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
94.1% regression in memory:chrome:all_processes for media.desktop at 515079:515125 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963286284406718656
,
Nov 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio Revision Result N chromium@515078 3925867 +- 3773649 21 good chromium@515125 3326699 +- 4799581 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963286284406718656 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 10 2017
Graph is up and down recently. May just be noise. Will run another bisect with wider range.
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963268477169942736
,
Nov 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Zhenyao Mo Commit : 1202f66559ca7e37f643a691cac72144ab60493f Date : Thu Nov 09 00:45:05 2017 Subject: [reland] Move GPU compositing blacklisting to GPU process. Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.m4a_type_audio Change : 62.74% | 2228224.0 -> 3626282.66667 Revision Result N chromium@514780 2228224 +- 0.0 9 good chromium@514966 2228224 +- 0.0 9 good chromium@515013 2228224 +- 0.0 9 good chromium@515025 2228224 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@515031 2228224 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@515034 2228224 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@515035 2228224 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@515036 3975797 +- 1914371 6 bad <-- chromium@515059 3626283 +- 2965730 9 bad chromium@515152 3975797 +- 1914371 6 bad chromium@515524 3626283 +- 2421509 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.m4a.type.audio media.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963268477169942736 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 10 2017