Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
95.3%-136.3% improvement in blink_perf.layout at 514117:514432 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSuspiciously large improvements, did something break?
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963319471689494992
,
Nov 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found, tests failed to produce values Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables/multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963319471689494992 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 13 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/100aa5e1f80000
,
Nov 13 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/100aa5e1f80000
,
Nov 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963048041528036576
,
Nov 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Robert Hogan Commit : 11a2b7b75eeccbb4e06a5cf7faed637af7b6719a Date : Mon Nov 06 22:28:46 2017 Subject: Remove unnecessary extra layout in table cells Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables/multicol_fixed-height-with-spanner-and-nested-tables Change : 131.68% | 141.252150466 -> 327.247480748 Revision Result N chromium@514000 141.252 +- 9.39258 6 good chromium@514133 149.572 +- 1.32651 6 good chromium@514200 147.612 +- 1.19351 6 good chromium@514239 153.709 +- 2.46222 6 good chromium@514253 146.443 +- 0.858887 6 good chromium@514257 147.92 +- 0.934519 6 good chromium@514258 146.019 +- 1.29539 6 good chromium@514259 318.853 +- 3.54725 6 bad <-- chromium@514260 324.57 +- 2.71676 6 bad chromium@514266 327.247 +- 2.31622 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963048041528036576 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 10 2017