Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2%-4.5% regression in memory.desktop at 514848:515101 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323204934066704
,
Nov 10 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author zmo@chromium.org === Hi zmo@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Zhenyao Mo Commit : 1202f66559ca7e37f643a691cac72144ab60493f Date : Thu Nov 09 00:45:05 2017 Subject: [reland] Move GPU compositing blacklisting to GPU process. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/TrivialScrollingPageSharedPageState Change : 3.91% | 12022409.0 -> 12492164.5 Revision Result N chromium@515008 12022409 +- 18174.5 6 good chromium@515032 12030823 +- 35499.4 6 good chromium@515035 12037005 +- 15121.4 6 good chromium@515036 12457466 +- 56521.6 6 bad <-- chromium@515037 12488879 +- 49929.1 6 bad chromium@515038 12459386 +- 81668.2 6 bad chromium@515044 12461875 +- 74248.5 6 bad chromium@515055 12462957 +- 50871.3 6 bad chromium@515101 12492165 +- 69896.4 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialScrollingPageSharedPageState memory.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323204934066704 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 10 2017
Issue 783722 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 10 2017
Issue 783723 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 10 2017
Issue 783721 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 10 2017
Issue 783697 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 10 2017
,
Nov 11 2017
Issue 783869 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 15 2017
Looking at both win10_perf and win8_perf bots, they are running with GPU compositing blacklisted. This is not the path we ship to most users and not the path we optimize. With my CL, we delay the blacklist decision to until GPU process launch and return a GPU channel, so we end up doing some extra wasted work if GPU compositing is blacklisted. This is expected. We'll have to live with the new baselines for these tests. However, if we run perf tests on bots with real GPU and GPU compositing enabled, such regression won't happen. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 10 2017