Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
35.4% regression in blink_perf.layout at 514572:514641 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323370738271472
,
Nov 11 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.layout Metric : floats_100_100_nested/floats_100_100_nested Revision Result N chromium@514571 604.695 +- 66.8814 21 good chromium@514641 692.36 +- 815.715 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323370738271472 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 13 2017
Looks like we reverted to the previous average. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 10 2017