Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
26.2%-75.8% regression in scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases at 514695:514780 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 10 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323503365219824
,
Nov 10 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases Metric : queueing_durations/sync_scroll_offset.html Revision Result N chromium@514694 0.118305 +- 0.979252 21 good chromium@514780 0.118269 +- 0.791211 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=sync.scroll.offset.html scheduler.tough_scheduling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963323503365219824 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 10 2017
False alert, the ref moved at the same time.
,
Jan 11 2018
WontFix-ing per #4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 10 2017