Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.6% regression in blink_perf.image_decoder at 513665:513722 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 8 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14837476f80000
,
Nov 8 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14837476f80000
,
Nov 8 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1128c656f80000
,
Nov 8 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1128c656f80000
,
Nov 8 2017
Simon: Looks like pinpoint is getting '0' for both runs on this test - is there an issue with the testing / pulling values?
,
Nov 8 2017
Looks like there might be a bug reading the histogram output, specifically the histogram with name='decode-gif' has a stories diagnostic, with 'decode-gif.html', but there's no story specified in the job.
,
Jan 11 2018
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/14deea77040000
,
Jan 26 2018
hans: I'm really sorry the bisect has had so much trouble with this perf regression. But in the bisect in #8, it really looks like the clang roll from November, r513697, regressed this benchmark. (I posted a screenshot showing how I came to the conclusion that it's the clang roll, sorry the new bisector is a bit confusing for this bug.) Is there anything that can be done at this point?
,
Jan 29 2018
I'm not sure when we'll get to it, but let's leave this open as the benchmark doesn't seem to have recovered.
,
Jan 29 2018
Thanks! Taking the Performance-Sheriff label off this bug, since it doesn't sound like it makes sense for us to ping for updates.
,
Aug 27
Looking at the performance graph now, this change doesn't stand out at all. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 8 2017