Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.6% regression in memory:chrome:all_processes for media.desktop at 512469:512507 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionLooks like a return to previous values a few days back. But will bisect to see if we reverted something or somehow immediately regressed some improvement.
,
Nov 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963556925169654144
,
Nov 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Zhenyao Mo Commit : 39d8a7f229e1330e72724895eb4730b7108e47a0 Date : Mon Oct 30 13:45:42 2017 Subject: Revert "One step further into moving GPU feature decisions to GPU process" Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_garden2_10s.webm_seek Change : 1.33% | 146298290.556 -> 148243235.5 Revision Result N chromium@512468 146298291 +- 384255 9 good chromium@512478 146353788 +- 78539.8 6 good chromium@512483 146331970 +- 265714 9 good chromium@512484 146375534 +- 112225 9 good chromium@512485 148443860 +- 2293332 9 bad <-- chromium@512486 148386431 +- 2180989 9 bad chromium@512488 148400837 +- 2208298 9 bad chromium@512507 148243236 +- 2063533 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.garden2.10s.webm.seek media.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963556925169654144 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 7 2017