Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4%-328.6% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 513730:513955 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionWow, the only relevant V8 CL seems to be the turbofan OOB KeyedLoadIC support. Hmm. Will bisect.
,
Nov 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963581674751093440
,
Nov 7 2017
Possibly relevant CL. https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/b7168573ed011113746873fd92b71e8bcc9dddb1
,
Nov 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_sum/browse_news/browse_news_cricbuzz Revision Result N chromium@513738 248.146 +- 208.184 21 good chromium@513765 247.919 +- 239.661 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.cricbuzz v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963581674751093440 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 21 2017
These recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 7 2017