Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.2%-87.2% regression in v8.browsing_desktop at 513173:514056 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis captures the string-slice experiment Benedikt kicked off. The bug can be closed, it's simply here for informational purposes.
,
Nov 7 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963582592962176272
,
Nov 7 2017
Associated CL (the nice revert part) https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/1b9e9bb9abeb58135364db117b185d81c6cb5a87
,
Nov 7 2017
Awesome, so now we have precise data that SlicedStrings are a net win!
,
Nov 7 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.browsing_desktop Metric : v8-gc-incremental-step_max/browse_news/browse_news_nytimes Revision Result N chromium@513414 8.2359 +- 13.3327 21 good chromium@513466 8.45181 +- 13.9355 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.news.nytimes v8.browsing_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963582592962176272 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 7 2017