Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Regression: Focus is lost on pressing tab key on password bubble.
Reported by
aiman.an...@etouch.net,
Nov 7 2017
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionChrome Version: 64.0.3261.0 (Official Build)aac97fe5f3cb5890bedac2a2ba9fec6b3e8c16fc-refs/heads/master@{#514329} (64-bit) OS: Mac(10.12.6, 10.13.1). Steps to reproduce: 1. Launch Chrome, login to Gmail with valid credentials 2. On password bubble press tab key and observe. Actual Result: Focus is lost in between when focus travels from username and Show Password(eye) icon. (Also focus does not travel to cross icon). Expected Result: Focus should travel properly in between username and Show Password(eye) icon. This is regression issue broken in ‘M-64’ and below per-revision bisect result Using the per-revision bisect providing the bisect results, Good Build: 64.0.3260.0(Revision:514067) Bad Build:64.0.3261.0(Revision:514329) You are probably looking for a change made after 514116 (known good), but no later than 514117 (first known bad). CHANGE-LOG URL: The script might not always return single CL as suspect as some perf builds might get missing due to failure. https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/04f1082efb63369e19ace6dde8b62c8702303b88..6b6e8fe1fcf17e0545c688d1bfda16d6f79fd97e Suspect: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/6b6e8fe1fcf17e0545c688d1bfda16d6f79fd97e @tapted: Could you please check whether this is caused with respect to your change, if not please help us in assigning it to the right owner. Note: Issue is not seen on Linux and Win OS Thank You!
,
Nov 7 2017
*Focus is meant to skip the close [x], since it's considered part of the window frame.
,
Nov 7 2017
Hi, No, On windows the focus travels properly. Only on Mac the focus is lost while traveling from username to eye icon.
,
Nov 7 2017
pbos@ FYI
,
Nov 7 2017
Load balancing. tapted@ take it back if you were already looking into it.
,
Nov 8 2017
heh - I bounced around a bit, but found the cause. In,
std::unique_ptr<views::Label> CreatePasswordLabel(
const autofill::PasswordForm& form,
bool is_password_visible) {
base::string16 text =
form.federation_origin.unique()
? form.password_value
: l10n_util::GetStringFUTF16(
IDS_PASSWORDS_VIA_FEDERATION,
base::UTF8ToUTF16(form.federation_origin.host()));
auto label = base::MakeUnique<views::Label>(text, CONTEXT_BODY_TEXT_LARGE,
STYLE_SECONDARY);
label->SetHorizontalAlignment(gfx::ALIGN_LEFT);
if (form.federation_origin.unique() && !is_password_visible)
label->SetObscured(true);
label->SetFocusBehavior(views::View::FocusBehavior::ACCESSIBLE_ONLY);
return label;
}
we just need to delete that SetFocusBehavior line. It has no effect on non-Mac outside of an AccesiblePaneView, and it's not necessary on Mac to make views accessible to screen readers and other a11y clients.
,
Nov 8 2017
Cool, agreed on the root cause. Go ahead. :)
,
Nov 10 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/4def1d7b841aa15a452930b95ce1df0e1080e875 commit 4def1d7b841aa15a452930b95ce1df0e1080e875 Author: Trent Apted <tapted@chromium.org> Date: Fri Nov 10 00:51:24 2017 MacViews Passwords bubble: Don't put the password label into the focus chain. There's an unnecessary call to SetFocusBehavior on a views::Label. Except on Mac, View::SetFocusBehavior(ACCESSIBLE_ONLY) only has meaning inside a views::AccessiblePaneView. On Mac, it puts a view into the focus chain when "Full Keyboard Access" is set in System Preferences. Screen readers and a11y tools always traverse the full tree. Bug: 782185 Change-Id: I90402a05d3811c14704004d99d14f67c831fc648 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/760077 Reviewed-by: Vasilii Sukhanov <vasilii@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Trent Apted <tapted@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#515384} [modify] https://crrev.com/4def1d7b841aa15a452930b95ce1df0e1080e875/chrome/browser/ui/views/passwords/manage_password_items_view.cc
,
Nov 10 2017
,
Nov 10 2017
Note: Retested the above issue on latest Canary #64.0.3264.0 on Mac(10.12.6, 10.13.2) and fix is working as intended. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by tapted@chromium.org
, Nov 7 2017Labels: Proj-HarmonyDialogs