Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
alerts on old, no longer monitored data. |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 6 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/111aee92f80000
,
Nov 6 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/111aee92f80000
,
Nov 7 2017
Trying again using the most significant regression in the bunch.
,
Nov 7 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15d71316f80000
,
Nov 7 2017
📍 Pinpoint job started. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1482c5a6f80000
,
Nov 7 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/15d71316f80000
,
Nov 7 2017
📍 Couldn't reproduce a difference. https://pinpoint-dot-chromeperf.appspot.com/job/1482c5a6f80000
,
Nov 7 2017
Moving to Speed>Bisection. Pinpoint is not reproducing this regression. Graph show uptick across several bots, some pretty severe.
,
Nov 7 2017
The most significant regression is https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=17d9b71cbbc938143814dba78ef41b567ed4f24268ca533fc052c59b12166ca2&start_rev=476829&end_rev=514006 The timeAdded is 2017-06-28, so I'm not sure why we got this alert now. We just turned off alerting for the "reported_by_os" memory benchmarks because they were really noisy.
,
Nov 7 2017
Pinpoint looks broken: all the values are 0 on the graph... It looks like hte tests all failed with the traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/base/data/home/apps/s~chromeperf/pinpoint:clean-simonhatch-44e40fbe.405031831262280452/dashboard/pinpoint/models/quest/execution.py", line 99, in Poll
self._Poll()
File "/base/data/home/apps/s~chromeperf/pinpoint:clean-simonhatch-44e40fbe.405031831262280452/dashboard/pinpoint/models/quest/run_test.py", line 143, in _Poll
raise SwarmingTestError(self._task_id, result['exit_code'])
SwarmingTestError: The swarming task 39acab8893e00010 failed. The test exited with code 255.
,
Nov 7 2017
,
Nov 7 2017
Was this renamed recently? No benchmark named "media.desktop". Do you mean any of those benchmarks below? Available benchmarks are: loading.desktop A benchmark measuring loading performance of desktop sites. media.android.tough_video_cases Obtains media metrics for key user scenarios on Android. media.media_cns_cases Obtains media metrics under different network simulations. media.mse_cases Obtains media metrics for key media source extensions functions. media.tough_video_cases Obtains media metrics for key user scenarios. memory.desktop Measure memory usage on trivial sites. memory.long_running_desktop_sites Measure memory usage on popular sites. smoothness.key_desktop_move_cases system_health.common_desktop Desktop Chrome Energy System Health Benchmark. system_health.memory_desktop Desktop Chrome Memory System Health Benchmark. v8.browsing_desktop v8.runtimestats.browsing_desktop Pass --browser to list benchmarks for another browser.
,
Nov 7 2017
yes, it was renamed from media.tough_video_cases_tbmv2 to media.desktop.
,
Nov 7 2017
Some context, re:comment 10 (timing of alerts seems off) - I found these alerts by going to to the AV sheriff dashboard using the link below (normal AFAICT) - I do not have any buttons pressed to show triaged/improved alerts - The dashboard started clean this morning, so this alert "arrived" today
,
Nov 7 2017
,
Nov 7 2017
Speed infra team: should we file a bug about Chris's seeing really old alerts on our dashboard?
,
Nov 7 2017
Yeah if an alert suddenly appeared for really old data, that's a bug. I thought there was already a bug tracking that, but I can't find it so file a new one.
,
Nov 7 2017
Filed https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/issues/4026
,
Jul 23
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 6 2017