Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.3% regression in media.desktop at 512899:513282 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionRef didn't change. This looks real.
,
Nov 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963927047574507488
,
Nov 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : media.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_tulip2.mp4 Revision Result N chromium@512898 5619712 +- 0.0 21 good chromium@513282 5619712 +- 0.0 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.tulip2.mp4 media.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963927047574507488 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 9 2017
,
Nov 9 2017
Bisect isn't working right? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 3 2017