Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
15.1%-179.6% regression in memory.desktop at 512532:512731 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Nov 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935281070012016
,
Nov 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935225429569824
,
Nov 3 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935221540364432
,
Nov 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : d2e9756d46f6a324a1e98d3553eb045556a5f4af Date : Mon Oct 30 20:45:44 2017 Subject: cc: Use CHROMIUM_texture_storage_image for GMB backed texture resources. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/TrivialBlurAnimationPageSharedPageState Change : 130.78% | 15361250.3333 -> 35451454.2667 Revision Result N chromium@512531 15361250 +- 3487666 6 good chromium@512590 14294863 +- 5691245 6 good chromium@512605 15031717 +- 2943798 6 good chromium@512612 13246210 +- 1965972 6 good chromium@512614 14320773 +- 2493047 6 good chromium@512615 34908840 +- 3837290 6 bad <-- chromium@512616 35602355 +- 2477020 6 bad chromium@512619 34536442 +- 1993884 6 bad chromium@512648 35451454 +- 2335065 5 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=TrivialBlurAnimationPageSharedPageState memory.desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935225429569824 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : d2e9756d46f6a324a1e98d3553eb045556a5f4af Date : Mon Oct 30 20:45:44 2017 Subject: cc: Use CHROMIUM_texture_storage_image for GMB backed texture resources. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_flickr_infinite_scroll Change : 179.61% | 13323468.0 -> 37253848.0 Revision Result N chromium@512531 13323468 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512581 13323468 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512606 13323468 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512613 13323468 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512614 13323468 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512615 37253848 +- 0.0 6 bad <-- chromium@512616 37253848 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@512619 38127661 +- 4786073 6 bad chromium@512631 37253848 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@512731 37253848 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.flickr.infinite.scroll system_health.memory_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935281070012016 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Nov 3 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Sunny Sachanandani Commit : d2e9756d46f6a324a1e98d3553eb045556a5f4af Date : Mon Oct 30 20:45:44 2017 Subject: cc: Use CHROMIUM_texture_storage_image for GMB backed texture resources. Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_12_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_desktop Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/load_games/load_games_alphabetty Change : 41.50% | 11001536.0 -> 15567192.0 Revision Result N chromium@512531 11001536 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512581 11001536 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512606 11001536 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512613 11001536 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512614 11001536 +- 0.0 6 good chromium@512615 15567192 +- 0.0 6 bad <-- chromium@512616 15567192 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@512619 15567192 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@512631 15567192 +- 0.0 6 bad chromium@512731 15567192 +- 0.0 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.games.alphabetty system_health.memory_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963935221540364432 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Nov 3 2017