New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 781180 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: Feb 2018
Cc:
mlippautz@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1%-5.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 511404:511533

Project Member Reported by mlippautz@google.com, Nov 3 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 3 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=781180

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=c7188b051dfde7d12702c6dc0c321b45e9d9655db243cd28e3018bf1c40318cb


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus7v2
chromium-rel-mac-retina
chromium-rel-mac12
chromium-rel-win8-dual

Comment 3 by mlippautz@chromium.org, Nov 3 2017

Cc: -mlippautz@google.com mlippautz@chromium.org
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 3 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/long_running_tools/long_running_tools_gmail-background

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@511434      66317776 +- 5975188      21      good
chromium@511533      66441650 +- 5745721      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=long.running.tools.gmail.background system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963952663056991808


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 7 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
NO Perf regression found

Bisect Details
  Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : system_health.memory_desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:heap:effective_size_avg/long_running_tools/long_running_tools_gmail-background

Revision             Result                   N
chromium@511434      66586630 +- 5983533      21      good
chromium@511533      66444595 +- 5993495      21      bad

Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions:
  https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=long.running.tools.gmail.background system_health.memory_desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8963589840418259456


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 8 by mlippautz@chromium.org, Feb 1 2018

Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
►

Sign in to add a comment