Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
UI flickering/glitches on login screen |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue description
Google Chrome 64.0.3256.0 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)
Revision 0
Platform 10092.0.0 (Official Build) dev-channel link
What steps will reproduce the problem?
(1) AU to build 10092.0.0 and observe login screen (or)
Reboot device and observe login screen (or)
Sign-out of user account
What happens instead?
UI flickering/glitches observed. Once mouse pointer is moved, flickering stops
,
Nov 2 2017
Also seen on switching between VT1 and VT2
,
Nov 3 2017
,
Nov 3 2017
Moving the mouse fixes the issue; I'm moving this to a beta-blocker rather than dev. P Acceptable, Albert?
,
Nov 3 2017
"Acceptable" = needs to be investigated but we're proceeding with the dev push. Sorry it wasn't clearer.
,
Nov 3 2017
Repro'd issue only on link. No repro on caroline, samus, quawks
,
Nov 6 2017
,
Nov 6 2017
I also see this on: Google Chrome 64.0.3255.0 (Official Build) dev (64-bit) Revision 0 Platform 10089.0.0 (Official Build) dev-channel panther Firmware Version Google_Panther.4920.24.26 Customization ID PANTHER JavaScript V8 6.4.177 Flash 27.0.0.183
,
Nov 6 2017
,
Nov 6 2017
Issue 781884 has been merged into this issue.
,
Nov 6 2017
Panther, Link? They are all on kernel 3.8. I wonder if there is something missing in 3.8 that Mesa needs now?
,
Nov 7 2017
,
Nov 15 2017
Bisect shrinks the mesa commit range to 3f353342a6 - 6c530ad116 No UI flickering is detected before mesa commit 3f353342a6, which enables I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC as many places as possible. The full list of suspicious commits are 6c530ad116 i965: Reduce passing 2x32b of reloc_domains to 2 bits 2aacd22c0b i965: Convert reloc.target_handle into an index for I915_EXEC_HANDLE_LUT 4d26c77a71 i965: Use a C99 initializer for new validation list entries. 68d611ed8e i965: Simplify some bo != batch->bo special cases. 29ba502a4e i965: Use I915_EXEC_BATCH_FIRST when available. e24f3fb7c8 i965: Move add_exec_bo() ba9b71e56a i965: Ignore reloc read/write domains 3f353342a6 i965: Use I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC
,
Nov 15 2017
add a screenshot as a reference.
,
Dec 4 2017
Hi, this is tagged as a beta blocker for M64. We're not that far out and this bug hasn't been updated in a while. Ping? Thanks...
,
Dec 6 2017
,
Dec 7 2017
I'm also seeing severe screen issues and crashes on my Acer Chromebox i3 (panther) for the last 5 Dev builds (MS 64), but not just on the login screen. There's flickering and artifacts during normal use up to complete system crashes, too. It seems to be triggered by using a 4K screen via HDMI, as the Samsung U28D590 I have connected. I can avoid those crashes by switching DisplayPort, capping the resolution at 2560 x 1440, or attaching a Full HD (1920 x 1080) screen via HDMI instead. Reverting to the Beta channel (MS 63) completely eliminates all the issues.
,
Dec 7 2017
having a fix CL:810212 right now. It is caused by kernel 3.8 does not support I915_EXEC_NO_RELOC label, which is introduced in mesa uprev in 10077.0.0.
,
Dec 7 2017
Thanks; let's be sure to merge if needed to unblock the M64 beta block status. We're targeting next Tuesday 12-Dec for Beta, so whatever needs to move it along. Thanks!
,
Dec 8 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1 commit 9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Fri Dec 08 08:37:01 2017 UPSTREAM: drm/i915: Allow userspace to hint that the relocations were known Userspace is able to hint to the kernel that its command stream and auxiliary state buffers already hold the correct presumed addresses and so the relocation process may be skipped if the kernel does not need to move any buffers in preparation for the execbuffer. Thus for the common case where the allotment of buffers is static between batches, we can avoid the overhead of individually checking the relocation entries. Note that this requires userspace to supply the domain tracking and requests for workarounds itself that would otherwise be computed based upon the relocation entries. Using copywinwin10 as an example that is dependent upon emitting a lot of relocations (2 per operation), we see improvements of: c2d/gm45: 618000.0/sec to 632000.0/sec. i3-330m: 748000.0/sec to 830000.0/sec. (measured relative to a baseline with neither optimisations applied). BUG= chromium:781060 TEST=test_that link graphics_VTSwitch --iteration 10 and manually check if the screen is corrupted. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Fixup merge conflict in userspace header due to different baseline trees.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (cherry picked from commit ed5982e6ce5f106abcbf071f80730db344a6da42) Signed-off-by: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Change-Id: Ic4603b81a53c2f631e8e3fcb828f7f59e6ee2f0a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/810212 Commit-Ready: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Tested-by: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> [modify] https://crrev.com/9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c [modify] https://crrev.com/9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h [modify] https://crrev.com/9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
,
Dec 8 2017
,
Jan 3 2018
Hey, I never got the merge request so never made the approval. Were steps taken to merge into the M64 branch?
,
Jan 5 2018
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/676824da5419ddaa6b5f34d9914f7e068512a302 commit 676824da5419ddaa6b5f34d9914f7e068512a302 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Fri Jan 05 06:14:16 2018 UPSTREAM: drm/i915: Allow userspace to hint that the relocations were known Userspace is able to hint to the kernel that its command stream and auxiliary state buffers already hold the correct presumed addresses and so the relocation process may be skipped if the kernel does not need to move any buffers in preparation for the execbuffer. Thus for the common case where the allotment of buffers is static between batches, we can avoid the overhead of individually checking the relocation entries. Note that this requires userspace to supply the domain tracking and requests for workarounds itself that would otherwise be computed based upon the relocation entries. Using copywinwin10 as an example that is dependent upon emitting a lot of relocations (2 per operation), we see improvements of: c2d/gm45: 618000.0/sec to 632000.0/sec. i3-330m: 748000.0/sec to 830000.0/sec. (measured relative to a baseline with neither optimisations applied). BUG= chromium:781060 TEST=test_that link graphics_VTSwitch --iteration 10 and manually check if the screen is corrupted. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Fixup merge conflict in userspace header due to different baseline trees.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (cherry picked from commit ed5982e6ce5f106abcbf071f80730db344a6da42) Signed-off-by: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Change-Id: Ic4603b81a53c2f631e8e3fcb828f7f59e6ee2f0a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/810212 Commit-Ready: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Tested-by: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 9cc3363a3c20e7e7610183cb23312a5fc3b6cfd1) Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/848552 Reviewed-by: Po-Hsien Wang <pwang@chromium.org> [modify] https://crrev.com/676824da5419ddaa6b5f34d9914f7e068512a302/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c [modify] https://crrev.com/676824da5419ddaa6b5f34d9914f7e068512a302/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h [modify] https://crrev.com/676824da5419ddaa6b5f34d9914f7e068512a302/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
,
Jan 8 2018
,
Jan 8 2018
810212 merge landed at 10176.40.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sdantul...@chromium.org
, Nov 2 2017