Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
43% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 512390:512399 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964184247403472528
,
Nov 1 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : undefined-first-child/undefined-first-child Revision Result N chromium@512389 581.046 +- 380.073 21 good chromium@512399 529.622 +- 225.943 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964184247403472528 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 11 2018
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 31 2017