Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.6% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 509930:510017 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 31 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964186723327328736
,
Oct 31 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/text_constant_full_page_raster_15000_pixels_per_second Revision Result N chromium@509929 58.2858 +- 6.68565 21 good chromium@510017 58.1797 +- 5.60487 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.constant.full.page.raster.15000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964186723327328736 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 11 2018
This is within the noise. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 31 2017