Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
30.3% regression in thread_times.key_silk_cases at 511113:511161 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964676668258589296
,
Oct 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.key_silk_cases Metric : thread_GPU_cpu_time_per_frame/http___jsfiddle.net_xLuvC_1_show_ Revision Result N chromium@511112 26.1517 +- 1.95281 21 good chromium@511161 26.6454 +- 8.3171 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http...jsfiddle.net.xLuvC.1.show. thread_times.key_silk_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964676668258589296 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 8 2018
These timeseries have recovered and changed modality since October. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017