Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
80.4% regression in loading.mobile at 510973:511161 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964676707606850304
,
Oct 28 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : loading.mobile Metric : cpuTimeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/warm/FlipKart Revision Result N chromium@510972 866.022 +- 176.088 21 good chromium@511161 884.304 +- 129.27 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=FlipKart loading.mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964676707606850304 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 8 2018
These timeseries have recovered and re-regressed several times since October. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017