Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.1% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 510777:510851 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677012728447392
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : typed-array-construct-from-array/typed-array-construct-from-array Change : 14.21% | 580.938285692 -> 498.412187146 Revision Result N chromium@510776 580.938 +- 1.22881 6 good chromium@510814 580.348 +- 2.54476 6 good chromium@510819 580.252 +- 2.99553 6 good chromium@510822 580.523 +- 4.35554 6 good chromium@510823 580.377 +- 2.86963 6 good chromium@510824 497.193 +- 2.09514 6 bad <-- chromium@510833 497.808 +- 0.847799 6 bad chromium@510851 498.412 +- 5.92131 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677012728447392 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017