Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
62.9% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 511113:511161 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677291743132368
,
Oct 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.bindings Metric : id-getter/id-getter Revision Result N chromium@511112 151.447 +- 31.1138 21 good chromium@511161 124.118 +- 200.745 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677291743132368 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 5 2018
In all the graphs, this seems to be a return to normal levels after a blip. Bisect can't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017