Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.5% regression in blink_perf.svg at 510765:510824 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677473998926064
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.svg Metric : SvgHitTesting/SvgHitTesting Change : 9.23% | 52.9918333333 -> 57.881 Revision Result N chromium@510764 52.9918 +- 1.18228 6 good chromium@510794 53.8088 +- 0.748446 6 good chromium@510809 53.7375 +- 1.79728 6 good chromium@510817 53.7385 +- 1.69842 6 good chromium@510821 53.4562 +- 2.17014 6 good chromium@510823 54.5232 +- 3.89308 6 good chromium@510824 57.881 +- 2.45599 6 bad <-- Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.svg More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677473998926064 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017