Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
17.2% regression in blink_perf.dom at 510734:510782 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677519162478752
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : select-multiple-add/select-multiple-add Change : 4.45% | 3214.02941973 -> 3357.12813565 Suspected Commit Range 3 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/750ba7027d0a8d62aa843a0d27c2f13365022ca8..2e9451814cc0329083e6a3eeac30cfb67ab75c46 Revision Result N chromium@510733 3214.03 +- 609.174 9 good chromium@510758 3229.53 +- 719.899 9 good chromium@510770 3330.06 +- 107.885 14 good chromium@510777 3331.78 +- 109.327 14 good chromium@510779 3316.21 +- 257.789 14 good chromium@510780 --- --- build failure chromium@510781 --- --- build failure chromium@510782 3357.13 +- 45.727 14 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677519162478752 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 5 2018
Bisect didn't repro a large regression, and these are noisy/many recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017