Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
17.6% regression in blink_perf.css at 510769:510828 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677669317942016
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_10_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.css Metric : PseudoClassSelectors/PseudoClassSelectors Change : 18.23% | 5610.88958263 -> 4587.77363274 Revision Result N chromium@510768 5610.89 +- 27.2533 6 good chromium@510798 5456.0 +- 75.8058 6 good chromium@510813 5447.34 +- 18.1082 6 good chromium@510821 5557.82 +- 52.9251 6 good chromium@510823 5501.75 +- 47.5731 6 good chromium@510824 4577.53 +- 210.461 6 bad <-- chromium@510825 4544.27 +- 48.4346 6 bad chromium@510828 4587.77 +- 284.296 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.css More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677669317942016 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017