Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
20.6% regression in blink_perf.parser at 510800:510886 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677731412709760
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.parser Metric : query-selector-id-last/query-selector-id-last Change : 21.56% | 99494.2920128 -> 78044.0439486 Revision Result N chromium@510799 99494.3 +- 790.929 6 good chromium@510821 102828 +- 860.746 6 good chromium@510823 101302 +- 1613.95 6 good chromium@510824 80433.5 +- 658.596 6 bad <-- chromium@510827 80374.2 +- 1573.76 6 bad chromium@510832 78679.5 +- 746.307 6 bad chromium@510843 76741.8 +- 1967.84 6 bad chromium@510886 78044.0 +- 625.066 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677731412709760 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017