Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
18.1% regression in blink_perf.dom at 510765:510824 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677782134363632
,
Oct 26 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.dom Metric : select-single-remove/select-single-remove Change : 17.84% | 280.481871148 -> 230.456194678 Revision Result N chromium@510764 280.482 +- 8.01161 6 good chromium@510794 277.521 +- 3.10733 6 good chromium@510809 279.769 +- 9.91112 6 good chromium@510817 267.961 +- 40.2801 6 good chromium@510821 283.475 +- 7.67782 6 good chromium@510823 277.63 +- 16.3687 6 good chromium@510824 230.456 +- 6.23376 6 bad <-- Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964677782134363632 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 26 2017