Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.2% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases at 510821:510909 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964767890777123568
,
Oct 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Hans Wennborg Commit : 22525134c75ca2a005997a717f6887a23af86210 Date : Mon Oct 23 17:10:25 2017 Subject: win: Re-enable Clang by default Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/IE PirateMark Change : 10.62% | 23.8600748939 -> 21.3268067261 Revision Result N chromium@510820 23.8601 +- 0.671163 6 good chromium@510823 23.5075 +- 0.548318 6 good chromium@510824 20.632 +- 0.49998 6 bad <-- chromium@510825 20.7681 +- 0.614058 6 bad chromium@510826 20.6992 +- 0.538736 6 bad chromium@510832 20.5877 +- 0.615348 6 bad chromium@510843 20.6139 +- 0.582304 6 bad chromium@510865 20.962 +- 0.76351 6 bad chromium@510909 21.3268 +- 0.488906 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=IE.PirateMark smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964767890777123568 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 25 2017