Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.6% regression in blink_perf.shadow_dom at 510669:510708 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 25 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964768317240014288
,
Oct 25 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : blink_perf.shadow_dom Metric : v0-shadow-reprojection/v0-shadow-reprojection Revision Result N chromium@510668 20.4276 +- 1.3704 21 good chromium@510708 20.271 +- 2.48226 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing blink_perf regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/speed/benchmark_harnesses/blink_perf.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.shadow_dom More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964768317240014288 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 5 2018
This recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 25 2017