Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
[likely a revert] 10% regression in smoothness.tough_canvas_cases at 509840:509938 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964861281426706560
,
Oct 24 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964861235576405632
,
Oct 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Brian Salomon Commit : 43f8bf0f784f4182ed0fca9053ecf570caf7ad70 Date : Wed Oct 18 12:55:06 2017 Subject: Move clear-as-draw workaround to GrGLGpu and expose via GrContextOptions. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Metric : frame_times/tough_canvas_cases_canvas2d_balls_common_bouncing_balls.html?ball_image_with_shadow_back_image Change : 13.11% | 166.753583333 -> 188.616666336 Revision Result N chromium@509839 166.754 +- 4.648 6 good chromium@509889 167.985 +- 3.99028 6 good chromium@509890 170.149 +- 3.37427 6 good chromium@509890,skia@57caa660c0 169.601 +- 3.19725 6 good chromium@509890,skia@43f8bf0f78 185.374 +- 5.01606 6 bad <-- chromium@509890,skia@43938b8533 183.795 +- 4.32468 6 bad chromium@509891 188.599 +- 14.9755 6 bad chromium@509893 197.807 +- 30.8829 6 bad chromium@509896 202.817 +- 10.8534 6 bad chromium@509902 192.564 +- 28.7702 6 bad chromium@509914 190.378 +- 4.90132 6 bad chromium@509938 188.617 +- 25.1936 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tough.canvas.cases.canvas2d.balls.common.bouncing.balls.html.ball.image.with.shadow.back.image smoothness.tough_canvas_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964861281426706560 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 24 2017
Not a revert, likely a skia change (see comment #4)
,
Oct 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.tough_canvas_cases Metric : frame_times/tough_canvas_cases_canvas2d_balls_common_bouncing_balls.html?ball_image_with_shadow_back_image Change : 9.07% | 195.07202653 -> 173.875281405 Suspected Commit Range 3 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/fdac6853113863b7f6486781c465c8193b1c8ed9..9055c1faea785877d31113dc9d2f3d978fe16457 Revision Result N chromium@506703 195.072 +- 26.2786 9 good chromium@506714 187.482 +- 6.54186 9 good chromium@506719 189.618 +- 19.8171 14 good chromium@506720 --- --- build failure chromium@506721 --- --- build failure chromium@506722 184.269 +- 6.4086 14 bad chromium@506724 184.279 +- 2.78726 9 bad chromium@506744 177.711 +- 27.8532 9 bad chromium@506784 173.875 +- 3.68188 6 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=tough.canvas.cases.canvas2d.balls.common.bouncing.balls.html.ball.image.with.shadow.back.image smoothness.tough_canvas_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964861235576405632 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 24 2017