Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
27.9% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases at 509376:509446 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964939069146882336
,
Oct 23 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Focus Revision Result N chromium@509375 34.6492 +- 8.45071 21 good chromium@509446 35.2528 +- 4.62672 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Focus smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_filters_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964939069146882336 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Jan 8 2018
Chart is pretty noisy and bisect couldn't repro. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 23 2017