New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 776851 link

Starred by 1 user
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 776025
Owner:
█ hubbe@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Oct 2017
Cc:
█ hubbe@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.4% regression in media.desktop at 508968:509839

Project Member Reported by hubbe@chromium.org, Oct 20 2017 
See the link to graphs below.
Project Member

Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 20 2017 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=776851

(For debugging:) Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?sid=17e2468064ed8da8b609d924ac368aed2e5e7bccd97425619cb524407277b4d8


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

win-high-dpi
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 20 2017 


=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Bisect failed unexpectedly

Bisect was aborted with the following:
  Step('Check bisect finished on revision chromium@509325.fetch file 8ce1789ba10322924bbf3fb28405fcdeccba9fd2:DEPS') failed with return_code 1


Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_crowd720_vp9.webm

Revision             Result              N
chromium@508967      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509185      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509294      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509322      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509324      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509325      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509326      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509329      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509336      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509349      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509403      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509839      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd720.vp9.webm media.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965194758115144320


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 25 2017

Mergedinto: 776025
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found with culprit

Suspected Commit
  Author : Jakob Gruber
  Commit : f7b09b3bdd96b4bd686b413c7a26e13f08ac4601
  Date   : Mon Oct 16 16:04:12 2017
  Subject: Reland "[snapshot] Ship lazy TFJ builtins"

Bisect Details
  Configuration: winx64_high_dpi_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : media.desktop
  Metric       : memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/video.html?src_crowd720_vp9.webm
  Change       : 10.34% | 5070848.0 -> 5595136.0

Revision                           Result              N
chromium@508967                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509185                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509294                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509322                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509324                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509325                    5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509325,v8@972d460f4f      5070848 +- 0.0      6      good
chromium@509325,v8@f7b09b3bdd      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad       <--
chromium@509325,v8@efa038361d      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509325,v8@6627b0aaf7      5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509326                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509329                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509336                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509349                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509403                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad
chromium@509839                    5595136 +- 0.0      6      bad

To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=video.html.src.crowd720.vp9.webm media.desktop

More information on addressing performance regressions:
  http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions

Debug information about this bisect:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964816281040027120


For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection

Comment 6 by crouleau@chromium.org, Nov 2 2017

Labels: Performance-Media
►

Sign in to add a comment