Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 508493:508578 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 20 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965206505787612240
,
Oct 21 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_chrome/load_chrome_blank Revision Result N chromium@508492 16831657 +- 471737 21 good chromium@508578 16881754 +- 346258 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.chrome.blank system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965206505787612240 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 23 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964931286182738096
,
Oct 23 2017
Kicked a bisect on a wider range: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964931286182738096
,
Oct 24 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : sunxd Commit : 48493dc45de06867eec97e7944f56d511e3c4578 Date : Thu Oct 12 20:25:14 2017 Subject: cc: make solid color picture layer tiling respect device scale factor Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:malloc:effective_size_avg/load_chrome/load_chrome_blank Change : 1.66% | 16601277.3333 -> 16877225.3333 Revision Result N chromium@508377 16601277 +- 346080 6 good chromium@508433 16541652 +- 217032 6 good chromium@508440 16625105 +- 451665 9 good chromium@508441 16718370 +- 433029 14 good chromium@508442 16879933 +- 333302 9 bad <-- chromium@508444 16809359 +- 259612 6 bad chromium@508447 16918259 +- 164030 6 bad chromium@508461 16851208 +- 216440 6 bad chromium@508488 16847020 +- 216322 9 bad chromium@508599 16877225 +- 101638 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.chrome.blank system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964931286182738096 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 20 2017