fuchsia/update_sdk.py fails gsutil check on LUCI |
||
Issue descriptionSee: https://ci.chromium.org/swarming/task/3952ea21b20b6510?server=chromium-swarm.appspot.com Happens every other build. Maybe the way the update scripts finds depot_tools is not LUCI safe? https://cs.chromium.org/chromium/src/build/fuchsia/update_sdk.py?q=fuchsia/update_sdk.py&sq=package:chromium&dr&l=51
,
Oct 30 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/a2f9d952767ed7c8d5c1ff0aedcc819d964c77c2 commit a2f9d952767ed7c8d5c1ff0aedcc819d964c77c2 Author: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Date: Mon Oct 30 12:45:10 2017 [CQ] Use non-luci fuchsia bots for cq experiment This proceeds the experiment using the legacy bots, since luci bots are blocked on https://crbug.com/776734 . NOTRY=true Bug: chromium:772816 , chromium:776734 Change-Id: I7532e04e98a96d69dbeefcd6edf66fb0cddbe111 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/743365 Reviewed-by: Sergiy Byelozyorov <sergiyb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49034} [modify] https://crrev.com/a2f9d952767ed7c8d5c1ff0aedcc819d964c77c2/infra/config/cq.cfg
,
Nov 17 2017
Looks like this was fixed. The build is reported to have 100% LUCI correctness: https://luci-migration.appspot.com/masters/tryserver.v8/builders/v8_fuchsia_rel_ng/.
,
Nov 18 2017
Hum, hope it's really fixed. There is also this possibility: - The broken code paths were only revealed when there was an sdk update. - There was no update for a while and all bots got updated sdks over time... |
||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
||
Comment 1 by tandrii@chromium.org
, Oct 26 2017