Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 507817:507863 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965447575142441616
,
Oct 18 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/background/after_http_m_youtube_com_results_q_science Revision Result N chromium@507816 38416542 +- 754688 21 good chromium@507863 38381190 +- 1104451 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.m.youtube.com.results.q.science memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965447575142441616 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 18 2017
Bisect could not find a culprit. The graph is noisy and it looks like it is now back down to pre-this-regression levels. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 17 2017