Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.4% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases at 507378:507444 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965451811392736928
,
Oct 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: win_8_perf_bisect Benchmark : smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Metric : frame_times/MotionMark Canvas Stroke Shapes Revision Result N chromium@507377 46.1067 +- 3.57222 21 good chromium@507444 45.669 +- 2.2236 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=MotionMark.Canvas.Stroke.Shapes smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965451811392736928 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 18 2017
No culprit found. The graph is too noisy and the change is within the CI. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 17 2017