Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
85.6%-205.4% regression in v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile at 508758:508823 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 17 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965499713435218448
,
Oct 19 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_nexus6_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile Metric : v8-gc-latency-mark-compactor_max/browse_shopping/browse_shopping_amazon Revision Result N chromium@508757 49.1786 +- 96.9864 21 good chromium@508823 51.0913 +- 85.9419 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.shopping.amazon v8.runtimestats.browsing_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965499713435218448 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 19 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965324222584473952
,
Nov 7
This regression has been open for half a year. It's not very actionable and the regression has been in all Chrome user's hands for months. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 17 2017