Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
system_health.memory_mobile failing on chromium.perf/Android One Perf |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionsystem_health.memory_mobile failing on chromium.perf/Android One Perf Builders failed on: - Android One Perf: https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.perf/builders/Android%20One%20Perf
,
Oct 17 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Test failure found Bisect Details Configuration: android_one_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:chrome:all_processes:dump_count:background_avg/memory:chrome:all_processes:dump_count:background_avg Revision Exit Code N chromium@503116 1 +- N/A 5 good chromium@503197 1 +- N/A 5 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965538300657826096 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 23 2017
Spent a little time looking at this today. The issue is that the bot is consistently timing out, so results are never saved or uploaded. Will try to come back at this, hopefully tomorrow, and dig a bit further.
,
Oct 23 2017
Maria: I think just keeping system_health.memory_mobile passing on low end devices would get us quite far with memory benchmarking. Should we have your team be the point of triage for system_health.memory_mobile's breakage on Android one?
,
Dec 14 2017
,
Dec 14 2017
This is an ongoing issue, and seems to lead to cause system_health.memory_mobile to fail 10-20% of the time on Android One. I'm the current bot health sheriff and responsible for keeping the bots green. I'm assuming that we don't just want to disable system_health.memory_mobile on this platform, so I'm going to bump up the timeout from 3h to 4h given that successful runs of this benchmark regularly take around 2h50m. Juan, Maria, can you work together to come up with a long-term plan for how we should address this?
,
Dec 14 2017
The following revision refers to this bug: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/a79793994cb8f772fd9f6039a4c45535d53091d6 commit a79793994cb8f772fd9f6039a4c45535d53091d6 Author: Charlie Andrews <charliea@chromium.org> Date: Thu Dec 14 19:50:43 2017 Increase the system_health.memory_mobile timeout from 3h to 4h The benchmark regularly takes around 2h50m-3h on Android One, and has been regularly timing out for the past several months on the waterfall. NOTRY=true TBR=nednguyen@google.com Bug: 775242 Change-Id: I2945eef4c12bcf9540c93760c33f54df66dffc9a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/827605 Commit-Queue: Charlie Andrews <charliea@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Charlie Andrews <charliea@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#524150} [modify] https://crrev.com/a79793994cb8f772fd9f6039a4c45535d53091d6/testing/buildbot/chromium.perf.json [modify] https://crrev.com/a79793994cb8f772fd9f6039a4c45535d53091d6/tools/perf/core/perf_data_generator.py
,
Dec 18 2017
Increasing the timeout did help (thanks Charlie!), and the benchmark has been running a lot better after fixing issue 785446 . Not sure if there is much else left to do here? I'll check again in a few days, and close if the benchmark remains relatively happy.
,
Dec 18 2017
,
Dec 21 2017
The NextAction date has arrived: 2017-12-21
,
Dec 21 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 16 2017