Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-1.5% regression in memory.top_10_mobile at 508132:508191 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965831165096814992
,
Oct 13 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author japhet@chromium.org === Hi japhet@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Nate Chapin Commit : 591f8b71b99ba4a3826157e5bcd1eea7ca2c6d40 Date : Wed Oct 11 23:08:37 2017 Subject: LayoutImage shouldn't need to know about an image's revalidation state Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science Change : 1.13% | 48776756.4444 -> 49326075.5556 Revision Result N chromium@508131 48776756 +- 447664 9 good chromium@508146 48957208 +- 1004460 14 good chromium@508153 49042200 +- 623001 14 good chromium@508157 49059901 +- 919015 14 good chromium@508158 49732717 +- 531500 6 bad <-- chromium@508159 49717357 +- 498160 6 bad chromium@508161 49410767 +- 1142857 14 bad chromium@508191 49326076 +- 865702 9 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.en.m.wikipedia.org.wiki.Science memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965831165096814992 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965813879833480304
,
Oct 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Nate Chapin Commit : 591f8b71b99ba4a3826157e5bcd1eea7ca2c6d40 Date : Wed Oct 11 23:08:37 2017 Subject: LayoutImage shouldn't need to know about an image's revalidation state Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : memory.top_10_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:native_heap:proportional_resident_size_avg/foreground/http_en_m_wikipedia_org_wiki_Science Change : 1.70% | 48865340.5714 -> 49619224.0 Revision Result N chromium@508131 48865341 +- 758613 14 good chromium@508146 48990049 +- 706909 14 good chromium@508153 48970227 +- 523332 14 good chromium@508157 49042541 +- 658873 21 good chromium@508158 49565123 +- 424064 6 bad <-- chromium@508159 49358616 +- 724662 9 bad chromium@508161 49358323 +- 1114870 14 bad chromium@508191 49619224 +- 388866 6 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=http.en.m.wikipedia.org.wiki.Science memory.top_10_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965813879833480304 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 15 2017
Issue 774547 has been merged into this issue.
,
Oct 18 2017
Reverted the accused patch in https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/a99bfdf79831dea44584325e6669977d6ba8ddd6, graphs on https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=774552 seem to have recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 13 2017