Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
3.5% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 506699:506777 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965831462485413776
,
Oct 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found but unable to narrow commit range Build failures prevented the bisect from narrowing the range further. Bisect Details Configuration: win_x64_perf_bisect Benchmark : thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Metric : thread_raster_cpu_time_per_frame/text_hover_15000_pixels_per_second Change : 1.15% | 0.414584992953 -> 0.41935270392 Suspected Commit Range 2 commits in range https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+log/e04d39989fc56c1c959c34ccfe022c60605401af..b36cc32a9c6e39789189d9c4095ab01ad1e020be Revision Result N chromium@506698 0.414585 +- 0.00852584 14 good chromium@506719 0.415221 +- 0.0121165 14 good chromium@506728 0.415246 +- 0.0147777 21 good chromium@506734 0.417808 +- 0.038813 14 good chromium@506735 --- --- build failure chromium@506736 0.418849 +- 0.014676 14 bad chromium@506738 0.420146 +- 0.0211863 14 bad chromium@506777 0.419353 +- 0.0180023 14 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=text.hover.15000.pixels.per.second thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965831462485413776 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 13 2017