Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.2%-126% regression in system_health.common_desktop at 504730:504889 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965857927441082224
,
Oct 13 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965857551017814032
,
Oct 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : cpu_time_percentage_avg/browse_tech/browse_tech_discourse_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@504762 0.342191 +- 0.0347296 21 good chromium@504839 0.342793 +- 0.0100074 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.tech.discourse.infinite.scroll system_health.common_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965857927441082224 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 13 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : timeToFirstMeaningfulPaint_avg/load_media/load_media_soundcloud Revision Result N chromium@504734 986.257 +- 108.596 21 good chromium@504807 985.907 +- 122.269 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=load.media.soundcloud system_health.common_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8965857551017814032 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 26 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964634541566755264
,
Oct 26 2017
Could this be bimodal, or is the behavior that someone landed a change, reverted, and then re-landed quickly? If so, this might be difficult to find. We don't seem to have any ref builds for these as well, so I can't tell if this is real. If the next bisect fails, what can we do?
,
Oct 27 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: winx64intel_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.common_desktop Metric : cpu_time_percentage_avg/browse_media/browse_media_flickr_infinite_scroll Revision Result N chromium@504762 0.32419 +- 0.0336896 21 good chromium@504839 0.325892 +- 0.0381888 21 bad To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.flickr.infinite.scroll system_health.common_desktop More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8964634541566755264 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 27 2017
self-assigning to investigate
,
Jan 5 2018
Juan: are you still planning on looking at this bug?
,
Jan 8 2018
Sorry, no. Probably not. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 13 2017