Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.7% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 505783:506403 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966019686557782144
,
Oct 12 2017
=== BISECT JOB RESULTS === NO Perf regression found Bisect Details Configuration: android_webview_arm64_aosp_perf_bisect Benchmark : system_health.memory_mobile Metric : memory:webview:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/browse_media/browse_media_imgur Revision Result N chromium@505782 155928784 +- 27818687 21 good chromium@506403 160690904 +- 0.0 21 bad Please refer to the following doc on diagnosing memory regressions: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/memory-infra/memory_benchmarks.md To Run This Test src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-webview --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests --story-filter=browse.media.imgur system_health.memory_mobile More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966019686557782144 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Dec 12 2017
Bisect unable to find culprit, this regression exists in stable. Ignoring. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 11 2017