Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
9.3% regression in media_perftests at 507270:507290 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Oct 9 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966188049573056176
,
Oct 9 2017
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author xhwang@chromium.org === Hi xhwang@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL, please take a look at the results. === BISECT JOB RESULTS === Perf regression found with culprit Suspected Commit Author : Xiaohan Wang Commit : f28dc165a6cdec1fd029e7ffe03f5822ec74930d Date : Sat Oct 07 08:01:57 2017 Subject: (reland) media: Enable CDM host verification in CdmModule Bisect Details Configuration: win_perf_bisect Benchmark : media_perftests Metric : sinc_resampler_convolve/unoptimized_aligned Change : 3.79% | 29855.3123145 -> 28722.9341122 Revision Result N chromium@507269 29855.3 +- 134.652 6 good chromium@507280 29852.1 +- 85.1507 6 good chromium@507285 29851.0 +- 93.6289 6 good chromium@507288 29848.8 +- 36.6914 6 good chromium@507289 29811.5 +- 100.614 6 good chromium@507290 28722.9 +- 1961.74 6 bad <-- To Run This Test .\src\out\Release\media_perftests.exe --single-process-tests More information on addressing performance regressions: http://g.co/ChromePerformanceRegressions Debug information about this bisect: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8966188049573056176 For feedback, file a bug with component Speed>Bisection
,
Oct 9 2017
I don't think my CL would affect sinc_resampler_convolve at all. Also, from the graph, it seems the metric has somewhat recovered. Assign back to jrummell@ for investigation.
,
Oct 11 2017
Metric has gone back to the previous value, so marking this as done. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com
, Oct 9 2017